The headline is a purposeful double entendre that I could not resist. It's accurate for this article, and disturbingly plausible on the other front. I never wish to be vague or misleading, but sometimes headlines write themselves, and I hate to get in the way of a good one. (I did make the point of the article clear in the subtitle, in an effort to avoid being too obtuse.) We'll see how it goes, and I very much appreciate your note.