I do a lot of deep-dive reporting, and yes, this one was not one of those — there is enough consensus on this topic, and enough previous research, to report a confirming study without extensive new reporting. I agree with you that we must question the prevailing view, when it needs questioning. And I'm always looking for well-done research that goes against the grain. This is not that, IMO. Meanwhile, to your other suggestion: I get zero funding from any industry, advertiser or other source that would have any affect on what I write or how I write it. I make a very modest sum on my Medium writing based on reader engagement. And I take orders from no one — I'm an independent journalist who has no boss. I do listen to readers, however, and always keep an open mind about what to report on and how to do it.